"God" contradicts Free Will of all living beings including itself
If a being is all-knowing, it knows its future actions, what choices it will
make, and it cannot change them, otherwise its knowledge would be wrong,
and it wouldn't be all-knowing. An omniscient being has no free will to
choose actions; all it's actions are predetermined.
---
A benevolent "god", all-knowing being only has one option in any situation,
and that is the option that causes most good. Therefore, a perfectly good
all-knowing "god" has no free will.
---
--An all-knowing "god" instantly knows all of its future actions and therefore
has no free will to change them. A "god" with no free will is immoral.
---
--If an all-powerful and all-knowing "god" exists then this (by a long chain
of cause and effect) denies any free will of any living being.
---
If "god" has free will, but never chooses evil, it is immoral because it could
have created life in the same way: with free will, but also never choosing
evil. Therefore if there is a "god",it must be immoral, not all-powerful
and/or not all-knowing.
---
Free will is impossible if a being is perfectly good, omniscient or if it
created "Time" or "Life".
---
If "love" is valid and acceptable from a worthy "god" that has NO free
will to choose between good or evil then that "god" could have created
beings the same way; where their "love" and worth is valid, despite there
not being the existence of evil or free will.
If God has Free Will:
---
If a "god" has "free will", but never chooses evil, out of choice,
and still has free will then it could have created beings with the same
quality.
---
By choice, beings would never choose evil, but would still have free will.
So, if God has no free will, there is no need for the existence of evil.
---
If this is true,"god" must have created evil for other reasons, and therefore
is specifically immoral for causing all suffering. If a "god" has free will,
then it is immoral for not granting its creations the same ability to have
this free will and use it to only not choose evil. Or this "god" does choose
evil and suffering. This proves that it is immoral as it is also omniscient.
---
Either way, with or without "free will" a "god" would be immoral, and/or does
not exist, and/or is not all-knowing.
Evil and suffering contradict existence of a benevolent god
The existence of Evil, despite their being an all-powerful, benevolent
"creator", is normally explained away by saying that free will is more
important than happiness, that it has a higher moral worth. Allowing us
to choose between good and evil, and "creating" us so that we are capable
and inclined to do so, is more important than there being no suffering.
---
If a "god" is all-powerful and all-good, it would have created a universe
with no suffering and no evil. But, evil and suffering exist. Therefore a
"god" does not exist, is not all-powerful and/or is not benevolent.
---
Attempts to justify the existence of evil are called theodicies.
There are no fully working theodices. Even popular ones such as the 'free
will' theodicy were rejected thousands of years ago for reasons that
still stand today.
---
It seems that if there is a "god", it is not the all-good moral being
that classical religions would like us to believe.